Does the ORDER rules in the ranking changed ?
It's not anymore based on the "Registration date" field ?

Hi,

yes it's slightly different know. If there is a tie with the total number of challenges solved, they are ranked according to the date when the last challenge has been solved.

Cu, Erik

are you sure this works? I thought I was on 227 challs before rayden?

The ranking is based on who was the last to solve a challenge and as you said rayden reached 227 after you so he is placed on top

I think Paralax is right.
The order should be first the one who had the older date of last solved challenge... and the last the one who had the most recent date...

Two propositions for the ranking :
1 - First rank users by challenge solved. Then, in case of equality : rank users by the sum of the number of users who solved the same challenges...
So, the first will be the one who solve harder challenges...
But it will be more complicated to implement it in an SQL query.

2 - Do not rank users in case of equality...

>2 - Do not rank users in case of equality...
Or same rank

Yes it was that I want to say

hm. I did it this way cause it was proposed in some forum thread. Now I really have to think a lot about changing it again...

Hi all,

i think I know which thread you mean erik, but i am pretty sure it was mentioned the other way: The One who FIRST got his Challenge Nr. XXX should be the first...then if next one hits the same number number he should be second...the last one who hits this number should be last one ...and so on

Ray