Ah good, so you noticed!

! So, what YOU are saying is basically "FreeBSD is not based on unix, it's based on unix (unix modified, includes code of the original, in other words; based on unix, your words) so it's not based on unix".

1. Linux does load modules at boot time. In fact, I don't know ANY modular operating system that doesn't load modules at boot time.
2. Linux also allows you to turn off modules. I fact, I think just about any modular operating system will allow you to turn off modules.
3. Linux even allows you to unload modules at run time (although there could be some restrictions to this, I dunno, rhican is the linux expert not me).

Before booting when the prompt screen appears for we tell if we want freebsd normal or safe do you know that linux its based on unix because he may don't have code from it but freebsd have code that means it is not based it have code from him with based i mean took the general way behaviour and create one completely different from... know that..

Wow, another nice example of great Rayden-logic. You never cease to amaze me!
Does that sentence actually mean anything? I can't seem to find any meaning in it. What's your point?

You're making no sense at all... If I understand your illformed sentence correctly, you're saying "Linux IS based on unix because it DOESN'T have unix code in it, and FreeBSD IS NOT based on unix because it DOES have unix code in it".
First of all, unix is an OS family. FreeBSD is still based on AT&T unix from Bell Labs, since BSD was also based on it (and FreeBSD is a branch from BSD). They did rewrite all AT&T unix code due to license issues, but the concept was still the same, so it's still based on AT&T unix.
But I doubt you'll take my word for it, you'll probably find some more stupid wrong arguments to back up your story. If you don't believe me, take a look at the wiki pages of BSD and FreeBSD.

First sentence from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeBSD: "FreeBSD is a Unix-like free operating system descended from AT&T UNIX via the Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD) branch through the 386BSD and 4.4BSD operating systems."

First sentence from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD: "Berkeley Software Distribution (BSD, sometimes called Berkeley Unix) is the Unix derivative distributed by the University of California, Berkeley, starting in the 1970s."

You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about. I suggest you do some research, because you're kinda making a fool of yourself. Or at least just stick to the things you do know something about.

well as you want this i will told you something "
Based on BSD UNIX®
FreeBSD® is an advanced operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium® and Athlon&#8482, amd64 compatible (including Opteron™, Athlon 64, and EM64T), UltraSPARC®, IA-64, PC-98 and ARM architectures. It is derived from BSD, the version of UNIX® developed at the University of California, Berkeley. It is developed and maintained by a large team of individuals. Additional platforms are in various stages of development."
another thing is that you know were the FreeBsd stops after you choose between windows or linux or freebsd in multiple OS cases after this FreeBsd will prompt another screen where you choose reboot change for the default boot console but freebsd haven't yet botted and he have the kernel modules present in ram so its before booting and linux only loads kernel modules during booting understood... and forgive me because i will be dowsn for awile i have to finishe my macrodie "http://www.ticalc.org/pub/83plus/flash/shells/"

Hey it's an old thread, but i just stumbled on this and it made me smile.

I wonder how much M$ pay Rayden to spread misinformation, and when reading the start of the topic i remembered the image below, seemed appropriate.



Edit: Terrible typing, should read my post before i click "Submit"

about open source being communist:
Sure the people you hear most about as a r h stallman, and other prominent linux people, are more on the left side of the spectrum. Since they are the engineers that devote huge chunks of their time, they are the ones you hear about most. And in the earlier days linux folks tend to be on the left side of the political spectrum. However the community is so vast, and divers it just isn't true anymore. One fact is that the largest contributers to opensource are companies, since they need to scratch their own back. ebay runs on open source(and hence contributes back), last time i checked that's not very communist. more than half of the fortune 500 companies run large parts of infrastructure on the Free os. Every website on apache.. all commuies

Hence If you code opensource you are helping american economy .. somehow i believe thats contradictory to being a commie
but i'm not sure..

A quote i like:

They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. In fact knowing nothing is not a problem, it is those that know nothing and think they know everything that are the danger.