Author | Post | |||
BaRa |
A solution for the HUGE crypto challenges list. New section: Advanced Crypto where the cryptos go which just got that little edge (eg: where you even get the algo). Well you know what I mean.. Phas-style cryptos. ... (didn't check 'em all) 60: Crypto Training Programme [made by Caesum] 64: RSA - not always good [made by moyo] 65: Simple encryption (KPTA 1) [made by Phas(retired)] 72: Weak algorithm (KCTA1) [made by Phas(retired)] 73: Stronger key (KCTA 2) [made by Phas(retired)] 74: Crypto-Router [made by bb and Phas(retired)] 72: Weak algorithm (KCTA1) [made by Phas(retired)] 73: Stronger key (KCTA 2) [made by Phas(retired)] 74: Crypto-Router [made by bb and Phas(retired)] 75: Powerful key (KCTA 3) [made by Phas(retired)] 76: Hash me baby (ph128) [made by Phas(retired)] 77: Secret algorithm (KPTA 2) [made by Phas(retired)] 78: The Maldito Algorithm (MDA 1) [made by bb] 79: The Maldito Algorithm II (MDA 2) [made by bb] 80: Encrypting me softly (KPTA 3) [made by Phas(retired)] Any thoughts? Which crypto challenges would also fit in this list? Greetz BaRa |
|||
20.06.2006 14:54:57 |
|
|||
quangntenemy |
Nah I think I have enough smilies |
|||
20.06.2006 15:07:31 |
|
|||
cryptodoggy |
Maybe: 66: Ring0 Or...? [made by Goat] but not sure -Cryptodoggy |
|||
20.06.2006 15:28:15 |
|
|||
alt3rn4tiv3 |
I think that should be deleted lol =X |
|||
20.06.2006 16:14:54 |
|
|||
sniperkid |
Quote: Phas-style cryptos. dont forget BaRa-style steganos |
|||
20.06.2006 16:44:10 |
|
|||
fbracal |
I'm agree with BaRa, and about Ring0 or... it isn't advanced crypto after you have solved it. |
|||
20.06.2006 16:51:35 |
|
|||
Darkego |
I agree with Bara, its nice for my crypto smiley 8-) lol. But ok, some kin dof crypto require some programming so I think they need to be in another section. "Crypto-Programming:" or something. Cya, Darkego |
|||
Edited by Darkego on 22.06.2006 15:01:44 | ||||
22.06.2006 15:01:27 |
|
|||
sniperkid |
yea maybe Crypto Crypto-Programming and also Stegano Stegano-BaRa-type lol |
|||
22.06.2006 16:36:28 |
|
|||
unknown user |
I don't see the point in this. 'al draagt een aap een goude ring ...' i don't understand how making an 'advanced section' would solve any problem relating the largeness of the cyrpto list. |
|||
26.06.2006 05:37:37 |
|
|||
Phas(retired) |
Quote from Darkego: ...some kin dof crypto require some programming so I think they need to be in another section. "Crypto-Programming:" or something... Are you sure? I don't see that "Crypto-Programming" section. I'd say that 95% of cryptos require programming, but you can divide this 95% in two groups: the ones that can be solved with standard tools programmed by others (Cryptool, scbsolvr2, vigsolve, ...) and the ones where you need to code your own tool (aka Phas-style )... I don't know how you solved the base conversion challenges, but I coded my own tool for that, so for me they would fit in the crypto-programming section, but if someone tell me there is a known tool for base conversions, then it would fit in the first group... so I think it's too hard to classify the challenges by the "programming required" bit. I don't agree either with BaRa's classification in groups of "Advanced" and "Not advanced"(simple?) cryptos. Is for example "Amsco" an advanced crypto? I solved it by a combination of some coding and some work "by hand", and I consider it an advanced one, but some people found a solver on the net... again hard to classify... |
|||
12.07.2006 09:09:14 |
|